Metro-Dade
County Planning Department
Research Division
909 SE 1 Avenue, Suite 900
Miami, Fl 33131
January
6, 1985
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
Implications
of the Reagan Administration Agreements....................
The Cuban Born Population.............................................................
Natives of Cuban Parentage.............................................................
Cuban Birth Rates...........................................................................
Annual Data on Cuban Immigration.................................................
The Cuban Impact on Dade's Future Population..............................
BACKGROUND
PAPER ON CUBAN IMMIGRATION INTO DADE COUNTY
Implications
of the Reagan Administration Agreements
The
recent discussions and agreements reached by the governments
of the United States and Cuba will have an immediately and
long term influence on the number of Cubans entering Dade
County. What are the elements of these agreements and
what will be the quantitative result as they are implemented?
The
first result, and it is essential, is a normalization of immigration
procedures between Cuba and the United States. This
means that Cuban nationals who wish to emigrate and can qualify
will be eligible to receive preference visas. A maximum
of 20,000 persons per year could enter the United States this
way. In addition, immigrant visas will be granted to
spouses, parents and unmarried children below 21 years of
age of United States citizens. These are not counted
against the 20,000 limit. This category may comprise
about 2,000 persons annually. Also, over and above the
quota are persons classified as refugees; basically political
prisoners and their families. The actual number is set
each year by the State Department with Congressional consent.
It is thought that about 15,000 to 20,000 of these persons
may be allowed in over a four to five year period.
Another
facet of these immigration policies has to do with the handling
of the former Mariel entrants who are currently in the United
States. These people are being allowed to apply for permanent
residence status beginning now and with a retroactive effect
of about 30 months. As permanent residents they can
then proceed to full citizenship status with the right to
bring in parents, spouses, and minor unmarried children none
of whom count against quota.
What
does all this imply for making some estimate of the ultimate number
of Cubans who will enter the United States and reside in Dade
County over the next several years. Figures from 200,000
to 400,000 have been set forth as possible. The number of
variables which can influence this number is extensive and information
about these variables is scant or nonexistent. Rather than
speculate about the future in the absence of some firm information,
the approach taken herein is to look at past experience with Cuban
immigration and in that way perhaps draw some reasonable conclusion
about the situation.
The
Cuban Born Population
New
Year's Day, 1985 marks the twenty-sixth anniversary of Castro's
ascent to power in Cuba.
In the 25 years since New Year's Day 1959, Dade County has served
as the gateway to America for approximately 0.75 million Cuban
refugees.
 |
The 1980 decennial census reported that there were 607,800
Cuban-born residents of the United States. With
the addition of 125,000 Mariel refugees, the total by 1984
is close to three-quarters of a million persons. Approximately
425,000 of these (57 percent) are residents of Dade County.
The decennial census counted 325,000 Cuban-born residents
of Dade County in 1980, and it is estimated that about 100,000
of the Mariel refugees settled or resettled in Dade in the
early 1980's.
|
Table
1 presents decennial census data for the Cuban-born population
in the United States and in the Miami metropolitan area (Dade
County) for the years 1960, 1970, and 1980. The 1980 data
are considered to be more reliable than the data for the two previous
censuses. Special efforts were made in 1980 to ensure a
full count of persons of Spanish origin, and the undercount problems
experienced in the previous years were not evident in 1980.
The
increasing concentration of Cuban-born persons in the Miami
metropolitan areas is noteworthy, particularly in the decade
of the 1970s. In this period the number of Cuban-born
persons in the United States increased by about 170,000, while
the number in the Miami area grew by 140,000. Thus,
more than 80 percent of the net increase in Cuban-born residents
of the United States was accounted for by the increase in
the Miami are alone. In the 1960s, the Miami area accounted
for less than half (45 percent) of the increase in Cuban-born
United States residents.
When
the Mariel refugees are added to the 1980 census totals, the
number of Cuban-born residents in the United States today
grows to about 633,000, with 67 percent of these residing
in Dade County (assuming that approximately 100,000 of the
125,000 Marielitos settled or resettled in the Miami area
in the early 1980s).
Natives
of Cuban Parentage
As
the Cuban-born population continues to grow, so also does
the number (Table 2) of native Americans of Cuban parentage
or origin; however, this group is still relatively small.
In 1980, they amounted to less than 25 percent of the Cuban
origin population in the United States (198,400 out of 806,200)
and only about 20 percent of the Cuban-origin population in
Dade County (82,300 out of 407,300). The relatively
small size of this group is due to the recency of the Cuban
influx, the older age profile of the Cuban population in the
United States, and the very low birth rates of this population.
Again,
as with the Cuban-born population, the increasing concentration
of natives of Cuban parentage in the Miami metropolitan area
is noteworthy. In the 1970s, for example, this group
grew by 50,000 persons in Dade County, accounting for more
than two-thirds of the national growth of this group (77,000).
The
50,000 increase in natives of Cuban parentage in the Miami
area in the 1970s is composed of two groups: (1) those that
were born in the Miami Area, and (2) those that were born
elsewhere in the United States and migrated to the Miami area.
The 1980 census reported that approximately 32,800 of the
natives of Cuban parentage in the Miami area were under ten
years of age. Assume that about 30,000 of these were
born in the Miami area in the 1970s. The remaining 20,000
of the 50,000 increase must then be those who were born in
other parts of the United States and who migrated to the Miami
area in the 1980s. These data lend support to the argument
that many Cuban families initially settled in other parts
of the United States, eventually returned to the Miami area.
The 1980 census reported that about 60,000 persons of Hispanic
origin (primarily Cuban) in t he Miami area reported living
in a different state in the United States in 1975.
Thus,
the growth of the Cuban population in the Miami area stems
from three sources:
(1)
immigration from Cuba and other countries --the largest source;
(2) immigration from other parts of the United States; and
(3) natural increase (i.e. excess of births over deaths).
Cuban
Birth Rates
Unlike
most Hispanic population groups, the Cubans in the United
States have exhibited birth and fertility rates that are quite
low. These rates are the lowest of all Hispanic population
groups, and are even lower than the rates for non-Hispanic
groups. In 1981, for example, the birth rate for Cubans
was 10.9 births per 1,000. For non-Hispanic groups the
average was 15.2 births per 1,000.
The
low rates of the Cuban population were noted in a recent report
from the National Center for Health Statistics:
Birth
and fertility rates for the Cuban population continue to be
substantially below the rates for any other group. This
is partly because the Cuban population is relatively older
than t he other Hispanic populations. CPS (Current Population
Survey) data for 1981 indicate that the median age of Cuban
women in the United States was 35.7., considerably above that
of women of other Hispanic origins. Monthly Vital Statistics
Report, "Births of Hispanics Parentage, 1981," (December 11,
1984), p.2
Birth
and death rates for Cubans in the Miami area are not readily
available. The State of Florida does not code deaths
by country of origin or by Hispanic origin, and it was only
in 1979 that the State began to code births by Hispanic origin.
The estimated 30,000 births to Cubans in the Miami area suggested
by the census data (see above) generally corresponds with
the birth rates cited by the National Center for Health Statistics.
Health Department computer tapes for 1980, 1982, and 1984
were available and a review of these files shows the following:
In
estimating the amount of growth due to natural increase, the
births must be reduced by the number of deaths to the Cuban
population. Dade on Cuban deaths are not available.
While the Cuban population is on average older than the non-Cuban
population, there are relatively few elderly Cubans (65 years
and over). Cubans age 65 and over accounted for about
23 percent of the elderly population in Dade County in 1980,
whereas all Cubans accounted for 25 percent of the total population.
For this reason the crude death rate of the Cuban population
is probably lower than the rate for the total population (9.6
deaths per 1,000 in 1983). Assuming a crude death rate
of 8.6 (the national average for 1983-84) and a population
of more than 500,000, Cuban deaths might be expected to average
4,300 a year, or about 2 percent of the annual average number
of resident deaths in Dade in the early 1980s.
Thus,
the natural increase might be anticipated to average 1,000
to 2,000 a year -- 5,000 to 5,500 births less approximately
4,000 to 4,500 deaths. Clearly, the future growth of
the Cuban population will continue to come primarily from
immigration, with natural increase playing a minor role.
| Table
4 summarizes data on the Cuban-origin population of Dade County
and the United States from 1960 to 1980. It also compares
the Cuban-origin population with the total Spanish-origin
population in 1970 and 1980 (comparable 1960 data were not
available). Note that the Cuban-origin population, while
dominant in the Miami area (accounting for 70 percent and
more of the Spanish origin population) represents less than
6 percent of the total Spanish-origin population of the United
States. |
 |
Note
also that while the Cuban-origin population in the Miami area
increased rapidly in the 1970s (87 percent), the total Spanish-origin
population increased even more rapidly (94 percent). This
group virtually doubled in size from 81,000 in 1970 to 174,000
in 1980, a reflection of the continuing attractiveness of the
United States to residents of the Caribbean and Latin America.
Annual
Data on Cuban Immigration
The
decennial census data are snapshots of the population at ten-year
intervals. These snapshots present evidence of the net
change over time, but do not reveal the dramatic fluctuations
in population change on an annual basis. These annual
changes are most important to an understanding of the impact
of refugee flows in the Miami area. The annual reports
from the Bureau's Current Population Survey do not afford
the geographical detail necessary to analyze change in the
Miami area.
The
major source of annual data on refugees and immigrants is
the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS).
For various reasons the INS data series are of uneven quality.
Data on the Mariel refugees, for example, appear to be complete,
but data pertaining to other immigrant groups (e.g. Haitians)
and to Cubans in the early 1960s are incomplete. A major
reason for the deficiencies in the INS data series is the
desire of many immigrants to avoid contact with this agency
for fear of exclusion or deportation.
Professor
Juan Clark's study of the Cuban refugee flow presents annual
data from the records of the INS which document the two major
periods of exodus from Cuba (Reference: Juan M. Clark, "The
Exodus from Revolutionary Cuba, 1959-1974: A Sociological
Analysis" (Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Florida, 1975).
"The Early Departures" occurred in the 1959 to 1962 period,
basically from the ascent of Castro to the Cuban Missile crisis
of October 1962. The second major outflow o refugees
occurred in the Freedom Flight period, from September 1965
to 1973. Clark's tabulations are presented in Table
5.
Table
5
Number
of Cubans entering the United States
According to U.S. Immigration Categories, 1959-1974
Entries to the United States
Year
Total
1959 - 62,800
1960 - 60,781
1961 - 50,857
1962 - 73,632
1963 - 15,535
1964 - 15,045
1965 - 25,366
1966 - 55,422
1967 - 49,756
1968 - 50,182
1969 - 49,415
1970 - 49,220
1971 - 43,323
1972 - 11,489
1973 - 11,308
1974 - 16,406
Total
......... 640,237
The
figures reported by Professor Clark do not correspond with INS
data reported in the Statistical Abstract of the United States:
1984, Tables 125 and 126. Clark's figures show total immigration
in the 1960s amounting to abut 446,000, whereas the Statistical
Abstract figures show 257,000 immigrants of Cuban birth and
209,000 immigrants with Cuba as their last permanent residence.
The immigrant classification systems used to report immigrants
are complicated and change over time, but the differences in
the numbers reported for the 1960s seem too great to be accounted
for by classification differences.
The
decennial census reports for 1960 and 1970 show an increase
of 360,000 Cuban born persons in the United States.
Even when this figure is inflated to account for those who
died or returned to Cuba in the 1960s, the total is still
substantially below the 446,000 reported by Clark.
Similar
inconsistencies occur in the data for the 1970s. When
Clark's figures for the 1970-1974 period are added to INS
data for the 1975-1979 period (Statistical Abstract, 1984,
Table 126) the total for the 1970s is just over 300,000 (301,346).
The INS summary data for the period 1971 to 1980 (Table 126)
show a total of 277,000. The increase derived from decennial
reports is only 169,000.
Additional
work is required to resolve these inconsistencies. However,
greater confidence must be placed in the decennia census
data.
The
Cuban Impact on Dade's Future Population
In
1984, as part of the biennial Master Plan amendment process,
the Dade County Planning Department proposed new population
projections for Dade County. These were designed to
replace an earlier set released in August 1981 and which had
been adopted as part of the Plan in 1983. The new projections
showed slower growth and reflected the impact of the 1981-82
recession which took a heavy toll on migration into Dade County.
A
key assumption of the new projections was that there would
be no new waves of refugees similar to those experienced in
the 1960s and 1970s and in 1980. However, the signing
of an agreement between Cuba and the United States in December
1984, suggests that a new wave of Cuban immigrants similar
in many respects to the Freedom Flights of the 1965 to 1973
period is likely. The Freedom Flights were intended
to reunite families separated in an earlier exodus from Cuban,
and in the five peak years (1967-1971) ferried an average
of about 45,000 persons a year to the United States.
The
new agreement essentially normalizes immigration between Cuba
and the United States. Under the agreement the United
States will resume the issuance of immigrant preference visas
to Cubans living in Cuba up to a maximum of 20,000 a year.
In addition, 3,000 political prisoners and their immediate
families will be allowed to enter the United States.
Further, an undetermined number of spouses, parents and minor
children of U.S. citizens (not subject to quota) will be admitted.
Thus,
beginning in 1985 Dade County can expect to serve as the gateway
to the United States for a minimum of 25,000 Cubans (20,000
immigrants, 3,000 political prisoners and their families,
and perhaps another 2,000 immediate family of United States
citizens). In 1986 and beyond this number may well increase
as Mariel refugees acquire United States citizenship and apply
to bring over spouses, unmarried minor children and parents.
By the end of the decade of the 1980s, the annual figure may
be in the 30,000 to 40,000 range.
The
U.S. Department of State has indicated that an attempt will
be made to resettle the political prisoners and their families
through voluntary agencies, but the bulk of the refugees are
expected to settle in Dade County. History suggests
that approximately 80 percent of the new immigrants will settle
or resettle in the Miami area.
Table
6 presents one projection of the immigrant inflow which begins
with a 25,000 level in 1985 and gradually increases to 30,000
by 1990. It is also quite possible that the inflow could
increase more rapidly, say, to a level of 40,000 by 1990.
It is also possible that governmental restraints may limit
the annual inflow to no more than 25,000 a year.
Table
7 takes the projection presented in Table 6, and assumes that
this inflow is an addition to the population increase previously
projected for Dade County. The net effect is to virtually
double the projected rate of growth of the population.
The previously projected annual increase of about 221,000
becomes 43,500. This high rate of increase is quite
possible, and would parallel the level of increase experienced
with the Freedom Flights in the late 1960s and 1970s.
A
plausible alternative would be to assume that the immigration
influx would tend to depress migration to the Miami area from
other parts of the United States and might well result in
increased out migration from the Miami area. Table 8
takes the projection presented in Table 6, and assumes that
the immigration inflow is the sole source of population growth
in Dade for the 1985 to 1990 period. Since a natural
increase (i.e., excess of births over deaths) of about 10,000
persons a year is projected for this period, this assumption
implies a net out migration of population of about 10,000
a year. A net out migration of population was experienced
only once before in Dade County. That was in 1982-83
period when Dade was in the depths of a severe economic recession.
In 1983, the Planning Department estimated, the projected
level of population increase averages about 22,400 a year--
exclusively Cuban.
The
two alternatives outlined above are not intended to represent
the extreme limits of a range of population change projections
that will shape the future of Dade County. They do represent
plausible alternatives at the high end and the low end, and
are presented for the purpose of illustrating the net effect
of the Cuban inflow under different growth assumptions.
Table
9 takes the alternative projections presented in Tables 7
and 8, and shows the net effect of the different assumptions
in terms of the percentage of the population that is of Cuban
origin in 1990. The Cuban-origin population is the same
in both Series, but the projected total population changes.
Under the Series I assumption (i.e., that the Cuban influx
is a net addition to the projected growth), the Cuban-origin
population amounts to about 32 percent of the projected 1990
population of 2,011,000. This 1990 population is about 132,000
higher than is now projected. Under the Series II assumption
(i.e., that the immigrant influx is the sole source of projected
population growth), the Cuban-origin population amounts to
about 34 percent of the projected 1990 population of 1,882,000.
This 1990 population is 3,000 higher than is now projected,
and reaches this level despite the implied out migration of
approximately 10,000 a year.
While
the Cuban-origin population is the dominant Spanish-origin
population group in Dade County, other Spanish-origin population
groups constitute a substantial proportion of the total population.
Moreover, as pointed out in Table 4 above, this group grew
faster than the Cuban-origin population in the Miami area
in the 1970s. If this group were to continue growing
at a rate of about 9,000 a year (the average for the 1970s)
they would constitute more than 250,000 persons by 1990, and
would bring the total Spanish-origin population of Dade to
about 900,000. This implies that the Spanish origin
population would enter then constitute between 45 percent
(Series I) and 48 percent (Series II) of the total population.
Internet Source: http://www.cuban-exile.com/doc_051-075/doc0072.htm
|